<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opinions on 69 Solid Link Building Tactics for 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.HomeBiz.bukiki.com/69-link-building-tactics-2009-my-opinion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.HomeBiz.bukiki.com/69-link-building-tactics-2009-my-opinion/</link>
	<description>Blogging Insights for Your Online Living</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 08:04:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis Liem</title>
		<link>http://www.HomeBiz.bukiki.com/69-link-building-tactics-2009-my-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-3248</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis Liem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.HomeBiz.bukiki.com/69-link-building-tactics-2009-my-opinion/#comment-3248</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think Google rank sites based on the script they use. But Google might put sites with better W3C standards higher on the SERP. Look for the phrase &quot;Does using W3C standards make a difference in ranking on Google?&quot; on http://groups.google.com/group/Google_Webmaster_Help/web/q-a-from-the-3rd-live-chat-oct-2008?pli=1 for more answers about Google.

Or you can just read some of them here: http://www.homebiz.bukiki.com/google-myths-facts-exposed/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think Google rank sites based on the script they use. But Google might put sites with better W3C standards higher on the SERP. Look for the phrase &#8220;Does using W3C standards make a difference in ranking on Google?&#8221; on <a  href="http://groups.google.com/group/Google_Webmaster_Help/web/q-a-from-the-3rd-live-chat-oct-2008?pli=1" rel="nofollow">http://groups.google.com/group/Google_Webmaster_Help/web/q-a-from-the-3rd-live-chat-oct-2008?pli=1</a> for more answers about Google.</p>
<p>Or you can just read some of them here: <a  href="http://www.homebiz.bukiki.com/google-myths-facts-exposed/" rel="nofollow">http://www.homebiz.bukiki.com/google-myths-facts-exposed/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: http://mousetraining.blogspot.com</title>
		<link>http://www.HomeBiz.bukiki.com/69-link-building-tactics-2009-my-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-3247</link>
		<dc:creator>http://mousetraining.blogspot.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.HomeBiz.bukiki.com/69-link-building-tactics-2009-my-opinion/#comment-3247</guid>
		<description>Yhanks for the information about Google only counting a single link where multiple links exist.

What I would love to know if you had an interest. Does Google rank php sites and ASP above HTML even if written in groovy DIV tags instead of tables. In other words does new technology in web sites outrank the old?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yhanks for the information about Google only counting a single link where multiple links exist.</p>
<p>What I would love to know if you had an interest. Does Google rank php sites and ASP above HTML even if written in groovy DIV tags instead of tables. In other words does new technology in web sites outrank the old?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cara Bisnis di Internet</title>
		<link>http://www.HomeBiz.bukiki.com/69-link-building-tactics-2009-my-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-2341</link>
		<dc:creator>Cara Bisnis di Internet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 23:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.HomeBiz.bukiki.com/69-link-building-tactics-2009-my-opinion/#comment-2341</guid>
		<description>I am interested, thanks. And so I want to say thanks for your following to me on twitter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am interested, thanks. And so I want to say thanks for your following to me on twitter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis Liem</title>
		<link>http://www.HomeBiz.bukiki.com/69-link-building-tactics-2009-my-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-2338</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis Liem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 16:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.HomeBiz.bukiki.com/69-link-building-tactics-2009-my-opinion/#comment-2338</guid>
		<description>Thanks, John! Hope the same for you too in 2009 :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, John! Hope the same for you too in 2009 <img src='http://www.HomeBiz.bukiki.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://www.HomeBiz.bukiki.com/69-link-building-tactics-2009-my-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-2334</link>
		<dc:creator>John Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.HomeBiz.bukiki.com/69-link-building-tactics-2009-my-opinion/#comment-2334</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s up very cool post man I wish I could put them together like that. MY whole approach is to DO FOLLOW my comments and actually every thing on my whole blog is followed. All that scientific search stuff is really a waste of time.I see people trying to sculpt page rank and choosing what comments are followed and all that I don&#039;t play that game I give the LUV to every comment I approve. In fact hitting 1000 comments now. I know this is risky but I don&#039;t have time to study it all. I keep up on what to do and not to do. I hate coming to blogs like this it just points out just how lame my blog really is :)
Hoping 2009 is awesome for you Peace
Stumbled

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;John Sullivan&#180;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://potpolitics.com/2009/01/15/who-are-you-in-social-media-2/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Who are you in Social Media&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s up very cool post man I wish I could put them together like that. MY whole approach is to DO FOLLOW my comments and actually every thing on my whole blog is followed. All that scientific search stuff is really a waste of time.I see people trying to sculpt page rank and choosing what comments are followed and all that I don&#8217;t play that game I give the LUV to every comment I approve. In fact hitting 1000 comments now. I know this is risky but I don&#8217;t have time to study it all. I keep up on what to do and not to do. I hate coming to blogs like this it just points out just how lame my blog really is <img src='http://www.HomeBiz.bukiki.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Hoping 2009 is awesome for you Peace<br />
Stumbled</p>
<p><abbr><em>John Sullivan&#180;s last blog post..<a  href="http://potpolitics.com/2009/01/15/who-are-you-in-social-media-2/" rel="nofollow">Who are you in Social Media</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
